May 2009 Archives

I have a theory on photography - if you have a good eye then you can take a great photo with any kind of camera. Fancy expensive cameras can definitely help, but it's kind of cheating. I have alot of dodgy cameras, polaroids, lomo, action samplers. You can get some fantastic pictures out of them. Some of the best. I still have my Polaroid 600 and am anxiously monitoring The Impossible Project to see if they start producing Polaroid film again.

This photo was taken with my iPhone and then I applied a Filter through the CameraBag app.

   The inflammatory title of this post is inspired by my ongoing experiences with my local DVD store. Here's the latest scenario... Sick child, need to work from home. Brainwave - go to the DVD store and rent as many movies as sick child would like so she rests and lets me get some work done. Great, takes mere seconds for sick child to pick out a couple of Barbie movies. Fantastic - get home, sick child cannot wait to start watching... my cunning plan is falling into place like a beautiful dance. So I endure the torturous minutes it takes to get to the actual menu (can I pay extra to get a DVD that skips these bits?) of a 'special' treat of sweeping through a circa 2002 3D landscape, a full 'intro' spoken by Barbie herself and then finally the selections pop up. Play movie - yes!

Every now and then I come across the age old debate of the internet and children's photos. This morning I read a blog post by MamaMia (@miafreedman). I have great respect for this lady and enjoy her blog so the following rant has nothing to do with her or her views.

It's usually starts out as innocent concern about children's likenesses and them being used on the web. As anyone with children knows you are repeatedly being asked to sign a waiver allowing your child to be photographed in the event that a photograph is taken and your child just happens to be in it.